2011, Volume 13, Issue 4
Strategic Study of CAE >> 2011, Volume 13, Issue 4
Large geomagnetic anomaly of impending earthquake gives a possibility in earthquake early warning
1. E-Right Seismomagnetic Study Group, Beijing 100192, China;
2. Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100081, China；
3. E-Right Research Company, Los Angeles CA91731, USA
Next Previous
Abstract
Strong magnetic anomalies repeatedly took place before big earthquakes. Based on geomagnetic record analysis results, we discussed a possible pattern of the magnetic anomalies prior to earthquake. In meizoseismal area or epicenter, in a time period of 36 hours to 10s minutes before earthquake, the exceptional big geomagnetic change increases with the magnitude of earthquake. We calculated that, in a place of 1 km from the epicenter, the magnetic anomaly before destructive earthquakes of Ms 6.0～9.5 can reach to 102～105 nT(the magnitude of earth's magnetic field is 5.5×104 nT), rather than the magnitude of 101 nT from seismomagnetic effect theories since 1964.From this we speculated the abnormal magnetic ULF near epicenter before earthquake seems to be an "intermittent magnetic eruption" . Accordingly, we proposed that geomagnetic induction earthquake pre-warning can be a new early warning method to surmount hardship in solving the puzzledom of earthquake imminent prediction.
Keywords
seismomagnetic effect ; geomagnetic induction pre warning ; pre-imminent magnetic anomaly ; intermittent magnetic eruption ; Tesla effect
Figures
图1
图2
图3
图4
图5
图6
References
[ 1 ] Robert J Geller, David D Jackson, Yan Y Kagan, et al.Earth- quakes cannot be predicted [ J ] . Science, 1997 , 275 : 1616 - 1617. link1
[ 2 ] Max Wyss.Cannot earthquakes be predicted? [ J ] .Science, 1997 ,278 :487 -490. link1
[ 3 ] Ian Main.Long odds on prediction [ J] .Nature,1997 ,385 :19 - 20. link1
[ 4 ] 胡锦涛.中国科学院和中国工程院两院院士大会讲话[ R] .北 京,2008.
[ 5 ] The New York Times.Earthquake in Portugal: graphic description of a recent earthquake [ N] .1858 -10 -25.
[ 6 ] Stacey F D.The seismomagnetic effect [ J] .Pure Appl Geophys, 1964 ,58 :5 -22.
[ 7 ] Nagata T.Tectonomagnetism [ J] .IAGA Bull,1969 ,27 :12 -43.
[ 8 ] Sasai Yoichi.Tectonomagnetic modeling based on the piezomag- netism: a review [ J] .Annali Di Geofisica,2001 ,44 ( 2 ) :361 - 368. link1
[ 9 ] Fitterman D V.Theory of electrokinetic -magnetic anomalies in a faulted half -space [ J] .J Geophys Res,1979 ,84 ( B11 ) :6031 - 6040. link1
[10] Zeng Xiaoping, Liu Zhengyan, Lin Yunfang, et al.The possible connection of the mantle plume phenomenon with the seismo - hydromagnetic effect prior to earthquakes -seismo -hydromag- netic effect and a plannar current model [ J ] .Earth Science Frontiers,2001 ,8 ( 2 ) :253 -258.
[11] Moore G W.Magnetic disturbances preceding 1964 Alaska Earth- quake [ J] .Nature,1964 ,203 :508 -509. link1
[12] Fraser -Smith A C, Bernardi A, McGill P R, et al.Low -fre- quency magnetic field measurements near the Epicenter of the Ms 7.1 Loma Prieta Earthquake [ J] .Geophysical Research Letters, 1990 ,17 :1465 -1468. link1
[13] Uyeda S.Electric and magnetic phenomena observed before the volcano -seismic activity in 2000 in the Izu Island Region, Japan [ J] .PNAS,2002 ,99 :7352 -7355. link1
[14] Freunf Friedemann.Toward a unified solid state theory for pre - earthquake signals [ J] .Acta Geophysica,2010 , 58 ( 5 ) :719 - 766. link1
[15] 郑吉盎.加强震磁关系研究开发地 磁预 警产 品实 现有效 防震 减灾 //高建国.综合风险鉴别与防 范技 术 研 究———灾 害 预 测 方法集成[ M] .北京:气象出版社,2010 :65 -69.
京公网安备 11010502051620号
