期刊首页 优先出版 当期阅读 过刊浏览 作者中心 关于期刊 English

《工程(英文)》 >> 2024年 第33卷 第2期 doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2023.10.010

高速公路车辆行驶中基于可达性的置信度感知碰撞概率检测

a School of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK
b Department of Cognitive Robotics, Delft University of Technology, Delft 2628 CD, The Netherlands
c School of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
d Chair of Traffic Process Automation, ‘‘Friedrich List” Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences, TU Dresden, Dresden 01069, Germany

收稿日期: 2022-10-27 修回日期: 2023-05-05 录用日期: 2023-10-11 发布日期: 2023-12-28

下一篇 上一篇

摘要

Risk assessment is a crucial component of collision warning and avoidance systems for intelligent vehicles. Reachability-based formal approaches have been developed to ensure driving safety to accurately detect potential vehicle collisions. However, they suffer from over-conservatism, potentially resulting in false–positive risk events in complicated real-world applications. In this paper, we combine two reachability analysis techniques, a backward reachable set (BRS) and a stochastic forward reachable set (FRS), and propose an integrated probabilistic collision–detection framework for highway driving. Within this framework, we can first use a BRS to formally check whether a two-vehicle interaction is safe; otherwise, a prediction-based stochastic FRS is employed to estimate the collision probability at each future time step. Thus, the framework can not only identify non-risky events with guaranteed safety but also provide accurate collision risk estimation in safety–critical events. To construct the stochastic FRS, we develop a neural network-based acceleration model for surrounding vehicles and further incorporate a confidenceaware dynamic belief to improve the prediction accuracy. Extensive experiments were conducted to validate the performance of the acceleration prediction model based on naturalistic highway driving data. The efficiency and effectiveness of the framework with infused confidence beliefs were tested in both naturalistic and simulated highway scenarios. The proposed risk assessment framework is promising for real-world applications.

补充材料

相关研究