[ 1 ] Better energy, greater prosperity: achievable pathways to low-carbon energy systems [Internet]. Hawthorn: Energy Transitions Commission; 2017 Apr 25 [cited 2020 Mar 26]. Available from: https://apo.org.au/node/76074. link1

[ 2 ] World energy outlook 2018 [Internet]. Paris: International Energy Agency; 2018 Nov [cited 2020 Mar 26]. Available from: https://www.iea.org/ reports/world-energy-outlook-2018. link1

[ 3 ] World energy investment 2019 [Internet]. Paris: International Energy Agency; 2019 May [cited 2020 Mar 26]. Available from: https://www.iea. org/reports/world-energy-investment-2019. link1

[ 4 ] Chu S, Cui Y, Liu N. The path towards sustainable energy. Nat Mater 2017;16 (1):16–22. link1

[ 5 ] Hu G, Nicholas NJ, Smith KH, Mumford KA, Kentish SE, Stevens GW. Carbon dioxide absorption into promoted potassium carbonate solutions: a review. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2016;53:28–40. link1

[ 6 ] Chu S. Carbon capture and sequestration. Science 2009;325(5948):1599. link1

[ 7 ] Hu G. Novel promoters for carbon dioxide absorption in potassium carbonate solutions [dissertation]. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne; 2018. link1

[ 8 ] Andrews J, Shabani B. Re-envisioning the role of hydrogen in a sustainable energy economy. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2012;37(2):1184–203. link1

[ 9 ] Belsito E, Dewar A, Marten I. Global gas report 2018. Technical report. Boston: The Boston Consulting Group; 2018. link1

[10] Renewables 2018: analysis and forecasts to 2023 [Internet]. Paris: International Energy Agency; 2018 Oct [cited 2020 Mar 26]. Available from: https://www.iea.org/reports/renewables-2018. link1

[11] Linnemann J, Steinberger-Wilckens R. Realistic costs of wind-hydrogen vehicle fuel production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2007;32(10–11):1492–9. link1

[12] Pecher A, Kofoed JP, editors. Handbook of ocean wave energy. Cham: Springer; 2017. link1

[13] Global energy statistical yearbook 2018 [Internet]. New York: Enerdata; 2018 [cited 2020 Mar 26]. Available from: https://yearbook.enerdata.net/ 2017/. link1

[14] Robinius M, Raje T, Nykamp S, Rott T, Müller M, Grube T, et al. Power-to-gas: electrolyzers as an alternative to network expansion—an example from a distribution system operator. Appl Energy 2018;210:182–97. link1

[15] Net installed electricity generation capacity in Germany in 2018 [Internet]. Freiburg: Fraunhofer institute for solar energy systems (ISE); 2019 Jan 4 [cited 2020 Mar 26]. Available from: https://www.ise.fraunhofer. de/content/dam/ise/en/documents/News/Stromerzeugung_2018_2_en.pdf. link1

[16] Recent electricity data: power generation and consumption [Internet]. Berlin: Agora Energiewende; 2020 Mar 26 [cited 2020 Mar 26]. Available from: https://www.agora-energiewende.de/en/service/recent-electricity-data/chart/ power_generation/30.03.2020/02.04.2020/. link1

[17] Maroufmashat A, Fowler M. Transition of future energy system infrastructure; through power-to-gas pathways. Energies 2017;10(8):1089. link1

[18] Pivovar B. 2017 H2@SCALE workshop report. Report. Golden: National Renewable Energy Laboratory; 2016. Report No.: HT12.IN53. link1

[19] Hydrogen storage [Internet]. Washington, DC: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy; c2020 [cited 2020 Mar 26]. Available from: https://www. energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/hydrogen-storage. link1

[20] Pereira EG, da Silva JN, de Oliveira JL, Machado CS. Sustainable energy: a review of gasification technologies. Renewable Sustain Energy Rev 2012;16 (7):4753–62. link1

[21] Nikolaidis P, Poullikkas A. A comparative overview of hydrogen production processes. Renewable Sustain Energy Rev 2017;67:597–611. link1

[22] Fúnez Guerra C, Jaén Caparrós M, Nieto Calderón B, Sendarrubias Carbonero V, Nieto Gallego E, Reyes-Bozo L, et al. Viability analysis of centralized hydrogen generation plant for use in mobility sector. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2018;43(26):11793–802. link1

[23] Penev M, Melaina M, Bush B, Muratori M, Warner E, Chen Y. Low-carbon natural gas for transportation: well-to-wheels emissions and potential market assessment in California. Technical report. Golden: National Renewable Energy Laboratory; 2016. link1

[24] Wilberforce T, El-Hassan Z, Khatib FN, Al Makky A, Baroutaji A, Carton JG, et al. Developments of electric cars and fuel cell hydrogen electric cars. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2017;42(40):25695–734. link1

[25] cafcp.org [Internet]. West Sacramento: California fuel cell partnership; c2020 [cited 2020 Mar 26]. Available from: https://cafcp.org/. link1

[26] De Almeida LQ, Sales LCM, Sodré JR. Fuel consumption and emissions from a vehicle operating with ethanol, gasoline and hydrogen produced on-board. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2015;40(21):6988–94. link1

[27] Andrews J, Shabani B. Dimensionless analysis of the global techno-economic feasibility of solar-hydrogen systems for constant year-round power supply. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2012;37(1):6–18. link1

[28] Multi-year research, development and demonstration plan: 2016 fuel cells section [Internet]. Washington, DC: Fuel Cell Technologies Office; 2017 May [cited 2020 Sep 26]. Available from: https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/ 2017/05/f34/fcto_myrdd_fuel_cells.pdf. link1

[29] Sinigaglia T, Lewiski F, Santos Martins ME, Mairesse Siluk JC. Production, storage, fuel stations of hydrogen and its utilization in automotive applications—a review. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2017;42(39):24597–611. link1

[30] hydrogeneurope.eu/ [Internet]. European Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Association; c2020 [cited 26 March 2020]. Available from: https://hydrogeneurope.eu/. link1

[31] Power to gas strategy platform [Internet]. Berlin: German Energy Agency; c2016 [cited 2020 Mar 26]. Available from: https://www.dena.de/en/topicsprojects/projects/energy-systems/power-to-gas-strategy-platform/. link1

[32] Vlap H, van der Steen A, Knijp J, Holstein J, Grond L. An overview of the technical assumptions and results of the power-to-gas demonstration project in Rozenburg, the Netherlands Technical report. Groningen: Det Norske Veritas (DNV) Germanischer Lloyd (GL) Oil & Gas; 2015. link1

[33] H2@Scale CRADA projects: 2018 annual progress report. Technical report. Washington, DC: US Department of Energy; 2018.

[34] Hydrogen and fuel cells program [Internet]. Washington, DC: US Department of Energy; c2020 [cited 2020 Mar 26]. Available from: https://www. hydrogen.energy.gov/. link1

[35] Palmer G. Australia’s hydrogen future: a research report Technical report. Canberra: Energy Transition Hub; 2018. link1

[36] Maniatopoulos P, Andrews J, Shabani B. Towards a sustainable strategy for road transportation in Australia: the potential contribution of hydrogen. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2015;52:24–34. link1

[37] Penev M. Hybrid hydrogen energy storage [Internet]. Golden: National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL); 2013 May 22 [cited 2020 Mar 26]. Available from: http://www.h2fcsupergen.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/ 06/Hybrid-Hydrogen-Energy-Storage-Michael-Penev-National-Energy-ResearchLaboratory.pdf. link1

[38] Smolinka T. Water electrolysis: status and potential for development [Internet]. Freiburg: Fraunhoder Fraunhofer institute for solar energy systems (ISE); 2014 Mar 4 [cited 2020 Mar 26]. Available from: https:// www.fch.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2%20Water%20Electrolysis%20Status% 20and%20Potential%20for%20Development.pdf. link1

[39] Schmidt O, Gambhir A, Staffell I, Hawkes A, Nelson J, Few S. Future cost and performance of water electrolysis: an expert elicitation study. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2017;42(52):30470–92. link1

[40] Lehner M, Tichler R, Steinmüller H, Koppe M. The power-to-gas concept. In: Lehner M, Tichler R, Steinmüller H, Koppe M, editors. Power-to-gas: technology and business models. Cham: Springer; 2014. p. 7–17. link1

[41] Waidhas M. Electrolyzer technology—the Siemens view [Internet]. Sandviken: Hydrogen and Fuel Cell (HFC) Nordic; 2016 Oct 26 [cited 2020 Mar 26]. Available from: http://www.scandinavianhydrogen.org/wp-content/ uploads/2016/11/2_Manfred-Waidhas.pdf. link1

[42] Otten R. The first industrial PtG plant—Audi e-gas as driver for the energy turnaround [Internet]. Bruxelles: Community Economic Development and Employability Corporation (CEDEC); 2014 May 27 [cited 2020 Mar 26]. Available from: http://www.cedec.com/files/default/8-2014-05-27-cedecgas-day-reinhard-otten-audi-ag.pdf. link1

[43] Felgenhauer M, Hamacher T. State-of-the-art of commercial electrolyzers and on-site hydrogen generation for logistic vehicles in South Carolina. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2015;40(5):2084–90. link1

[44] Sutherland E, Joseck F. DOE hydrogen and fuel cells program record (15011): low volume production and delivery cost [Internet]. Washington, DC: US Department of Energy; 2015 Aug 20 [cited 2020 Mar 26]. Available from: https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/15011_low_volume_production_ delivery_cost.pdf. link1

[45] Joseck F. Technology acceleration and hydrogen infrastructure R&D overview [Internet]. Washington, DC: US Department of Energy; 2018 [cited 2020 Mar 26]. Available from: https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/progress18/ tahi_overview_2018.pdf. link1

[46] Rustagi N, Elgowainy A, Vickers J. DOE hydrogen and fuel cells program pecord (18003): current status of hydrogen delivery and dispensing costs and pathways to future cost reductions [Internet]. Washington, DC: US Department of Energy; 2018 Dec 17 [cited 2020 Mar 26]. Available from: https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/18003_current_status_hydrogen_ delivery_dispensing_costs.pdf. link1

[47] Weil S, Dillich S, Joseck F, Ruth M. DOE hydrogen and fuel cells program pecord (12001): H2 production and delivery cost apportionment [Internet]. Washington, DC: US Department of Energy; 2012 Dec 14 [cited 2020 Mar 26]. Available from: https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/12001_h2_pd_cost_ apportionment.pdf. link1

[48] James B, Colella W, Moton J, Saur G, Ramsden T. PEM electrolysis H2A production case study documentation [Internet]. Washington, DC: US Department of Energy; 2013 Dec 31 [cited 2020 Mar 26]. Available from: https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy15osti/61387.pdf. link1

[49] Zidar M, Georgilakis PS, Hatziargyriou ND, Capuder T, Škrlec D. Review of energy storage allocation in power distribution networks: applications, methods and future research. IET Gener Transm Distrib 2016;10(3):645–52. link1

[50] Doddathimmaiah A, Andrews J. Theory, modelling and performance measurement of unitised regenerative fuel cells. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2009;34(19):8157–70. link1

[51] Shabani B, Andrews J. An experimental investigation of a PEM fuel cell to supply both heat and power in a solar–hydrogen RAPS system. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2011;36(9):5442–52. link1

[52] De Falco M, Basile A, editors. Enriched methane: the first step towards the hydrogen economy. Cham: Springer; 2016. link1

[53] Chen C, Lu Y, Banares-Alcantara R. Direct and indirect electrification of chemical industry using methanol production as a case study. Appl Energy 2019;243:71–90. link1

[54] Marques Mota F, Kim DH. From CO2 methanation to ambitious long-chain hydrocarbons: alternative fuels paving the path to sustainability. Chem Soc Rev 2019;48(1):205–59. link1

[55] Morgan E, Manwell J, McGowan J. Wind-powered ammonia fuel production for remote islands: a case study. Renewable Energy 2014;72:51–61. link1

[56] Nayak-Luke R, Bañares-Alcántara R, Wilkinson I. ‘‘Green” ammonia: impact of renewable energy intermittency on plant sizing and levelised cost of ammonia. Ind Eng Chem Res 2018;57(43):14607–16. link1

[57] Van-Dal ES, Bouallou C. Design and simulation of a methanol production plant from CO2 hydrogenation. J Cleaner Prod 2013;57:38–45. link1

[58] Pérez-Fortes M, Schöneberger JC, Boulamanti A, Tzimas E. Methanol synthesis using captured CO2 as raw material: techno-economic and environmental assessment. Appl Energy 2016;161:718–32. link1

[59] Frontera P, Macario A, Ferraro M, Antonucci P. Supported catalysts for CO2 methanation: a review. Catalysts 2017;7(2):59. link1

[60] Modisha PM, Ouma CNM, Garidzirai R, Wasserscheid P, Bessarabov D. The prospect of hydrogen storage using liquid organic hydrogen carriers. Energy Fuels 2019;33(4):2778–96. link1

[61] Makepeace JW, He T, Weidenthaler C, Jensen TR, Chang F, Vegge T, et al. Reversible ammonia-based and liquid organic hydrogen carriers for highdensity hydrogen storage: recent progress. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2019;44 (15):7746–67. link1

[62] Zou YQ, von Wolff N, Anaby A, Xie Y, Milstein D. Ethylene glycol as an efficient and reversible liquid-organic hydrogen carrier. Nat Catal 2019;2:415–22. link1

[63] Shi L, Qi S, Qu J, Che T, Yi C, Yang B. Integration of hydrogenation and dehydrogenation based on dibenzyltoluene as liquid organic hydrogen energy carrier. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2019;44(11):5345–54. link1

[64] Dong Y, Yang M, Li L, Zhu T, Chen X, Cheng H. Study on reversible hydrogen uptake and release of 1,2-dimethylindole as a new liquid organic hydrogen carrier. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2019;44(10):4919–29. link1

[65] Wang G, Mitsos A, Marquardt W. Conceptual design of ammonia-based energy storage system: system design and time-invariant performance. AIChE J 2017;63(5):1620–37. link1

[66] Elgowainy A, Reddi K, Brown D. Hydrogen delivery infrastructure analysis Technical report. Chicago: Argonne National Laboratory; 2016. link1

[67] Demir ME, Dincer I. Cost assessment and evaluation of various hydrogen delivery scenarios. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2018;43(22):10420–30. link1

[68] Florisson O. NATURALHY: assessing the potential of the existing natural gas network for hydrogen delivery. Brussels: GERG Academic Network Event; 2010. link1

[69] Van der Zwaan BCC, Schoots K, Rivera-Tinoco R, Verbong GPJ. The cost of pipelining climate change mitigation: an overview of the economics of CH4, CO2 and H2 transportation. Appl Energy 2011;88(11):3821–31. link1

[70] Dodds PE, Staffell I, Hawkes AD, Li F, Grünewald P, McDowall W, et al. Hydrogen and fuel cell technologies for heating: a review. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2015;40(5):2065–83. link1

[71] Ronevich J, Feng Z, Slifka A, Amaro R, Song EJ, Wang Y. Fatigue performance of high-strength pipeline steels and their welds in hydrogen gas service Technical report. Washington, DC: US Department of Energy; 2018. link1

[72] Bicer Y, Dincer I. Comparative life cycle assessment of hydrogen, methanol and electric vehicles from well to wheel. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2017;42 (6):3767–77. link1

[73] Yang C, Ogden J. Determining the lowest-cost hydrogen delivery mode. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2007;32(2):268–86. link1

[74] Schmura E, Klingenberg M. Existing natural gas pipeline materials and associated operational characteristics. Technical report. Washington, DC: US Department of Energy Hydrogen Program; 2005. link1

[75] Reitenbach V, Ganzer L, Albrecht D, Hagemann B. Influence of added hydrogen on underground gas storage: a review of key issues. Environ Earth Sci 2015;73:6927–37. link1

[76] Lu HT, Li W, Miandoab ES, Kanehashi S, Hu G. The opportunity of membrane technology for hydrogen purification in the power to hydrogen (P2H) roadmap: a review. Front Chem Sci Eng 2020. In press. link1

[77] Pinchbeck D, Huizing R. Preparing for the hydrogen economy by using the existing natural gas system as a catalyst (overview of the NATURALHYproject) [Internet]. Luxembour: The Community Research and Development Information Service (CORDIS); c2010 [cited 2020 Mar 26]. Available from: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/502661. link1

[78] Altfeld K, Pinchbeck D. Admissible hydrogen concentrations in natural gas systems. Gas Energy 2013;2103(3):1–2. link1

[79] Melaina MW, Antonia O, Penev M. Blending hydrogen into natural gas pipeline networks: a review of key issues Technical report. Golden: National Renewable Energy Laboratory; 2013. link1

[80] Dodds PE, Demoullin S. Conversion of the UK gas system to transport hydrogen. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2013;38(18):7189–200. link1

[81] Hydrogen to be trialled in NSW gas networks [Internet]. Canberra: Australian Renewable Energy Agency; 2018 Oct 22 [cited 2020 Mar 26]. Available from: https://arena.gov.au/news/hydrogen-to-be-trialled-in-nsw-gas-networks/. link1

[82] Isaac T. HyDeploy: the UK’s first hydrogen blending deployment project. Clean Energy 2019;3:114–25. link1

[83] Ibeh B, Gardner C, Ternan M. Separation of hydrogen from a hydrogen/ methane mixture using a PEM fuel cell. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2007;32 (7):908–14. link1

[84] Todd DM. Gas turbine improvements enhance IGCC viability. In: Proceedings of the 2000 Gasification Technologies Conference; 2000 Oct 8–11; San Francisco, CA, USA; 2020. link1

[85] Weeks B. Hydrogen delivery in the natural gas pipeline network [Internet]. Washington, DC: US Department of Energy’s Hydrogen Energy Storage for Grid and Transportation Service Workshop; 2014 May 14 [cited 2020 Sep 26]. Available from: https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2015/01/f19/fcto_ 2014_h2_energy_storage_grid_transportation_svcs_wkshp_weeks.pdf. link1

[86] Ockwig NW, Nenoff TM. Membranes for hydrogen separation. Chem Rev 2010;110(4):2573–4. link1

[87] Baker RW. Future directions of membrane gas separation technology. Ind Eng Chem Res 2002;41(6):1393–411. link1

[88] Ghosal K, Freeman BD. Gas separation using polymer membranes: an overview. Polym Adv Technol 1994;5(11):673–97. link1

[89] Merkel TC, Lin H, Wei X, Baker R. Power plant post-combustion carbon dioxide capture: an opportunity for membranes. J Membr Sci 2010;359(1– 2):126–39. link1

[90] Kentish SE, Scholes CA, Stevens GW. Carbon dioxide separation through polymeric membrane systems for flue gas applications. Recent Pat Chem Eng 2008;1(1):52–66. link1

[91] Koros WJ, Fleming GK. Membrane-based gas separation. J Membr Sci 1993;83 (1):1–80. link1

[92] Zornoza B, Casado C, Navajas A. Chapter 11—advances in hydrogen separation and purification with membrane technology. In: Gandía LM, Arzamendi G, Diéguez PM, editors. Renewable hydrogen technologies. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2013. p. 245–68. link1

[93] Li P, Wang Z, Qiao Z, Liu Y, Cao X, Li W, et al. Recent developments in membranes for efficient hydrogen purification. J Membr Sci 2015;495:130–68. link1

[94] Lubitz W, Tumas W. Hydrogen: an overview. Chem Rev 2007;107 (10):3900–3. link1

[95] Peters TA, Kaleta T, Stange M, Bredesen R. Development of thin binary and ternary Pd-based alloy membranes for use in hydrogen production. J Membr Sci 2011;383(1–2):124–34. link1

[96] Peters TA, Kaleta T, Stange M, Bredesen R. Hydrogen transport through a selection of thin Pd-alloy membranes: membrane stability, H2S inhibition, and flux recovery in hydrogen and simulated WGS mixtures. Catal Today 2012;193(1):8–19. link1

[97] Robeson LM. Correlation of separation factor versus permeability for polymeric membranes. J Membr Sci 1991;62(2):165–85. link1

[98] Robeson LM. The upper bound revisited. J Membr Sci 2008;320(1– 2):390–400. link1

[99] Kamakoti P, Morreale BD, Ciocco MV, Howard BH, Killmeyer RP, Cugini AV, et al. Prediction of hydrogen flux through sulfur-tolerant binary alloy membranes. Science 2005;307(5709):569–73. link1

[100] Yun S, Ted OS. Correlations in palladium membranes for hydrogen separation: a review. J Membr Sci 2011;375(1–2):28–45. link1

[101] Shafie AH, An W, Hejazi SAH, Sawada JA, Kuznicki SM. Natural zeolite-based cement composite membranes for H2/CO2 separation. Sep Purif Technol 2012;88:24–8. link1

[102] Jiang DE, Cooper VR, Dai S. Porous graphene as the ultimate membrane for gas separation. Nano Lett 2009;9(12):4019–24. link1

[103] Huang A, Dou W, Caro J. Steam-stable zeolitic imidazolate framework ZIF-90 membrane with hydrogen selectivity through covalent functionalization. J Am Chem Soc 2010;132(44):15562–4. link1

[104] Zhang F, Zou X, Gao X, Fan S, Sun F, Ren H, et al. Hydrogen selective NH2-MIL53 (Al) MOF membranes with high permeability. Adv Funct Mater 2012;22 (17):3583–90. link1

[105] Esposito E, Mazzei I, Monteleone M, Fuoco A, Carta M, McKeown N, et al. Highly permeable Matrimid/PIM-EA (H2)-TB blend membrane for gas separation. Polymers 2019;11(1):46. link1

[106] McKeown NB, Budd PM. Polymers of intrinsic microporosity (PIMs): organic materials for membrane separations, heterogeneous catalysis and hydrogen storage. Chem Soc Rev 2006;35(8):675–83. link1

[107] Li FY, Xiao Y, Chung TS, Kawi S. High-performance thermally self-cross-linked polymer of intrinsic microporosity (PIM-1) membranes for energy development. Macromolecules 2012;45(3):1427–37. link1

[108] Kim S, Lee YM. Rigid and microporous polymers for gas separation membranes. Prog Polym Sci 2015;43:1–32. link1

[109] Zornoza B, Téllez C, Coronas J, Esekhile O, Koros WJ. Mixed matrix membranes based on 6FDA polyimide with silica and zeolite microsphere dispersed phases. AIChE J 2015;61(12):4481–90. link1

[110] Safak Boroglu M, Yumru AB. Gas separation performance of 6FDA-DAM-ZIF11 mixed-matrix membranes for H2/CH4 and CO2/CH4 separation. Sep Purif Technol 2017;173:269–79. link1

[111] Kim E, Kim H, Kim D, Kim J, Lee P. Preparation of mixed matrix membranes containing ZIF-8 and UiO-66 for multicomponent light gas separation. Crystals 2019;9(1):15. link1

[112] Weng TH, Tseng HH, Wey MY. Preparation and characterization of multiwalled carbon nanotube/PBNPI nanocomposite membrane for H2/CH4 separation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2009;34(20):8707–15. link1

[113] Sanders DF, Smith ZP, Guo R, Robeson LM, McGrath JE, Paul DR, et al. Energyefficient polymeric gas separation membranes for a sustainable future: a review. Polymer 2013;54(18):4729–61. link1

[114] Stern SA, Mi Y, Yamamoto H, Clair AKS. Structure/permeability relationships of polyimide membranes. Applications to the separation of gas mixtures. J Polym Sci Pol Phys 1989;27(9):1887–909. link1

[115] Hayes RA, inventor; E. I. Du Pont de Nemours and Company, assignee. Polyimide gas separation membranes. United States patent US4705540. 1987 Nov 10.

[116] Min KE, Paul DR. Effect of tacticity on permeation properties of poly(methyl methacrylate). J Polym Sci Pol Phys 1988;26(5):1021–33. link1

[117] Macchione M, Jansen JC, De Luca G, Tocci E, Longeri M, Drioli E. Experimental analysis and simulation of the gas transport in dense Hyflon AD60X membranes: influence of residual solvent. Polymer 2007;48(9):2619–35. link1

[118] Takada K, Matsuya H, Masuda T, Higashimura T. Gas permeability of polyacetylenes carrying substituents. J Appl Polym Sci 1985;30 (4):1605–16. link1

[119] Toy LG, Nagai K, Freeman BD, Pinnau I, He Z, Masuda T, et al. Pure-gas and vapor permeation and sorption properties of poly[1-phenyl-2-[p- (trimethylsilyl)phenyl]acetylene] (PTMSDPA). Macromolecules 2000;33 (7):2516–24. link1

[120] Nagai K, Higuchi A, Nakagawa T. Gas permeability and stability of poly(1- trimethylsilyl-1-propyne-co-1-phenyl-1-propyne) membranes. J Polym Sci Pol Phys 1995;33(2):289–98. link1

[121] Yang L, Fang J, Meichin N, Tanaka K, Kita H, Okamoto K. Gas permeation properties of thianthrene-5,5,10,10-tetraoxide-containing polyimides. Polymer 2001;42(5):2021–9. link1

[122] Tanaka K, Okano M, Toshino H, Kita H, Okamoto KI. Effect of methyl substituents on permeability and permselectivity of gases in polyimides prepared from methyl-substituted phenylenediamines. J Polym Sci Pol Phys 1992;30(8):907–14. link1

[123] Tanaka K, Islam MN, Kido M, Kita H, Okamoto KI. Gas permeation and separation properties of sulfonated polyimide membranes. Polymer 2006;47 (12):4370–7. link1

[124] Pinnau I, Toy LG. Gas and vapor transport properties of amorphous perfluorinated copolymer membranes based on 2,2-bistrifluoromethyl-4,5- difluoro-1,3-dioxole/tetrafluoroethylene. J Membr Sci 1996;109(1):125–33. link1

[125] Koresh JE, Soffer A. The carbon molecular sieve membranes: general properties and the permeability of CH4/H2 mixture. Sep Purif Technol 1987;22:973–82. link1

[126] Hong M, Li S, Falconer JL, Noble RD. Hydrogen purification using a SAPO-34 membrane. J Membr Sci 2008;307(2):277–83. link1

[127] Cacho-Bailo F, Seoane B, Téllez C, Coronas J. ZIF-8 continuous membrane on porous polysulfone for hydrogen separation. J Membr Sci 2014;464:119–26. link1

[128] Basile A, Dalena F, Tong J, Veziroglu TN, editors. Hydrogen production, separation and purification for energy. London: The Institution of Engineering and Technology; 2017. link1

[129] Yang RT. Adsorbents: fundamentals and applications. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2003. link1

[130] Sircar S. Production of hydrogen and ammonia synthesis gas by pressure swing adsorption. Sep Sci Technol 1990;25:1087–99. link1

[131] García-Pérez E, Gascón J, Morales-Flórez V, Castillo JM, Kapteijn F, Calero S. Identification of adsorption sites in Cu-BTC by experimentation and molecular simulation. Langmuir 2009;25(3):1725–31. link1

[132] Liu J, Keskin S, Sholl DS, Johnson JK. Molecular simulations and theoretical predictions for adsorption and diffusion of CH4/H2 and CO2/CH4 mixtures in ZIFs. J Phys Chem C 2011;115(25):12560–6. link1

[133] Guo HC, Shi F, Ma ZF, Liu XQ. Molecular simulation for adsorption and separation of CH4/H2 in zeolitic imidazolate frameworks. J Phys Chem C 2010;114(49):21891. link1

[134] Liu D, Lin YS, Li Z, Xi H. Adsorption and separation of CH4/H2 in MIL-101s by molecular simulation study. Chem Eng Sci 2013;98:246–54. link1

[135] Liu Y, Xiao S, Bai P, Hu H, Jin L. Adsorption separation performance of H2/CH4 on ETS-4 by concentration pulse chromatography. J Energy Chem 2014;23 (2):213–20. link1

[136] Casati C, Longhi P, Zanderighi L, Bianchi F. Some fundamental aspects in electrochemical hydrogen purification/compression. J Power Sources 2008;180(1):103–13. link1

[137] Iwahara H. Hydrogen pumps using proton-conducting ceramics and their applications. Solid State Ionics 1999;125(1–4):271–8. link1

[138] Wagner KK, Tiwari P, Swiegers GF, Wallace GG. An electrochemical cell with Gortex-based electrodes capable of extracting pure hydrogen from highly dilute hydrogen–methane mixtures. Energy Environ Sci 2018;11(1):172–84. link1

[139] Abdulla A, Laney K, Padilla M, Sundaresan S, Benziger J. Efficiency of hydrogen recovery from reformate with a polymer electrolyte hydrogen pump. AIChE J 2011;57(7):1767–79. link1

[140] Palazzo DF, Schreiner WC, inventors; Kellogg M W Co, assignee. Separation of hydrogen and methane. United States patent US3026683. 1962 Mar 27.

[141] Kim J, Maiti A, Lin LC, Stolaroff JK, Smit B, Aines RD. New materials for methane capture from dilute and medium-concentration sources. Nat Commun 2013;4:1694–701. link1

[142] Klamt A. COSMO-RS: from quantum chemistry to fluid phase thermodynamics. In: Friedl A, Klemeš JJ, Radl S, Varbanov PS, Wallek T, editors. Computer aided chemical engineering. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2018. p. 9. link1

[143] Klamt A. Conductor-like screening model for real solvents: a new approach to the quantitative calculation of solvation phenomena. J Phys Chem 1995;99 (7):2224–35. link1

[144] Suzuki K, Sue H, Itou M, Smith RL, Inomata H, Arai K, et al. Isothermal vapor– liquid equilibrium data for binary systems at high pressures: carbon dioxide– methanol, carbon dioxide–ethanol, carbon dioxide–1-propanol, methane– ethanol, methane–1-propanol, ethane–ethanol, and ethane–1-propanol systems. J Chem Eng Data 1990;35(1):63–6. link1

[145] Ukai T, Kodama D, Miyazaki J, Kato M. Solubility of methane in alcohols and saturated density at 280.15 K. J Chem Eng Data 2002;47(5):1320–3. link1

[146] Trinh TKH, de Hemptinne JC, Lugo R, Ferrando N, Passarello JP. Hydrogen solubility in hydrocarbon and oxygenated organic compounds. J Chem Eng Data 2016;61(1):19–34. link1

[147] Ferrando N, Lachet V, Teuler JM, Boutin A. Transferable force field for alcohols and polyalcohols. J Phys Chem B 2009;113(17):5985–95. link1

[148] Ferrando N, Lachet V, Boutin A. Transferable force field for carboxylate esters: application to fatty acid methylic ester phase equilibria prediction. J Phys Chem B 2012;116(10):3239–48. link1

[149] Ferrando N, Lachet V, Boutin A. Monte Carlo simulations of mixtures involving ketones and aldehydes by a direct bubble pressure calculation. J Phys Chem B 2010;114(26):8680–8. link1

[150] Ferrando N, Gedik I, Lachet V, Pigeon L, Lugo R. Prediction of phase equilibrium and hydration free energy of carboxylic acids by Monte Carlo simulations. J Phys Chem B 2013;117(23):7123–32. link1

[151] Ferrando N, Lachet V, Pérez-Pellitero J, MacKie AD, Malfreyt P, Boutin A. A transferable force field to predict phase equilibria and surface tension of ethers and glycol ethers. J Phys Chem B 2011;115(36):10654–64. link1

[152] Rufford TE, Smart S, Watson GCY, Graham BF, Boxall J, Diniz da Costa JC, et al. The removal of CO2 and N2 from natural gas: a review of conventional and emerging process technologies. J Pet Sci Eng 2012;94–95:123–54. link1

[153] Grashoff GJ, Pilkington CE, Corti CW. Purification of hydrogen. Platin Met Rev 1983;27(4):157–69. link1

[154] Rufford TE, Chan KI, Huang SH, May EF. A review of conventional and emerging process technologies for the recovery of helium from natural gas. Adsorpt Sci Technol 2014;32(1):49–72. link1

[155] Zhang F, Zhao P, Niu M, Maddy J. The survey of key technologies in hydrogen energy storage. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2016;41(33):14535–52. link1

[156] Eslamimanesh A, Mohammadi AH, Richon D, Naidoo P, Ramjugernath D. Application of gas hydrate formation in separation processes: a review of experimental studies. J Chem Thermodyn 2012;46:62–71. link1

[157] Aceves SM, Petitpas G, Espinosa-Loza F, Matthews MJ, Ledesma-Orozco E. Safe, long range, inexpensive and rapidly refuelable hydrogen vehicles with cryogenic pressure vessels. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2013;38(5):2480–9. link1

[158] Hopkins JA, Dimartino SP, Nicholas DM, inventors; Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., assignee. Hybrid membrane/cryogenic process for hydrogen purification. United States patent US4654047. 1987 Mar 31.

[159] Bartolozzi I, Rizzi F, Frey M. Comparison between hydrogen and electric vehicles by life cycle assessment: a case study in Tuscany, Italy. Appl Energy 2013;101:103–11. link1

[160] Granovskii M, Dincer I, Rosen MA. Life cycle assessment of hydrogen fuel cell and gasoline vehicles. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2006;31(3):337–52. link1

[161] Granovskii M, Dincer I, Rosen MA. Economic and environmental comparison of conventional, hybrid, electric and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles. J Power Sources 2006;159(2):1186–93. link1

[162] Hacatoglu K, Rosen MA, Dincer I. Comparative life cycle assessment of hydrogen and other selected fuels. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2012;37 (13):9933–40. link1

[163] Suleman F, Dincer I, Agelin-Chaab M. Environmental impact assessment and comparison of some hydrogen production options. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2015;40(21):6976–87. link1

[164] International Energy Agency. The future of hydrogen: seizing today’s opportunities Technical report. Paris: International Energy Agency; 2019. link1

[165] Yun S, Qin Y, Uhl AR, Vlachopoulos N, Yin M, Li D, et al. New-generation integrated devices based on dye-sensitized and perovskite solar cells. Energy Environ Sci 2018;11(3):476–526. link1

[166] Zhang H, An P, Zhou W, Guan BY, Zhang P, Dong J, et al. Dynamic traction of lattice-confined platinum atoms into mesoporous carbon matrix for hydrogen evolution reaction. Sci Adv 2018;4(1):1–9. link1

[167] Abdulrahman MW, inventor; Abdulrahman MW, assignee. Direct contact heat transfer in the thermolysis reactor of hydrogen production Cu–Cl cycle. United States patent US20170015552. 2017 Jan 19.

[168] Marques JGO, Costa AL, Pereira C. Na–O–H thermochemical water splitting cycle: a new approach in hydrogen production based on sodium cooled fast reactor. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2018;43(16):7738–53. link1

[169] Wajda T, Gabriel K. Thermolysis reactor scale-up for pilot scale Cu-Cl hybrid hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2019;44(20):9779–90. link1

[170] Goldie-Scot L. A behind the scenes take on lithium-ion battery prices. London: BloomburgNEF; 2019 Mar 5 [cited 2020 Mar 26]. Available from: https://about.bnef.com/blog/behind-scenes-take-lithium-ion-battery-prices/. link1