Journal Home Online First Current Issue Archive For Authors Journal Information 中文版

Engineering >> 2021, Volume 7, Issue 5 doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2021.01.007

Implications of the EU’s Inclusion of Maritime Transport in the Emissions Trading System for Shipping Companies

a Department of Logistics and Maritime Studies, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, China
b School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
c Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby DK-2800, Denmark

Available online: 2021-03-19

Next Previous

Figures

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

References

[ 1 ] United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Review of maritime transport 2020 [Internet]. Geneva: United Nations; 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 7]. Available from: https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/rmt2020_ en.pdf. link1

[ 2 ] Faber J, Hanayama S, Zhang S, Pereda P, Comer B, Hauerhof E, et al. Reduction of GHG emissions from ships. Fourth IMO GHG Study 2020. Final report. London: International Maritime Organization; 2020 Jul. Report No.: IMO doc MEPC 75/7/15.

[ 3 ] International Maritime Organization. Initial IMO strategy on reduction of GHG emissions from ships. Report. London: International Maritime Organization; 2018. Report No.: IMO doc MEPC 72/17/Add.1, Annex 11.

[ 4 ] The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Regulations on the monitoring, reporting and verification of carbon dioxide emissions from maritime transport. Regulation. Strasbourg: The European Parliament; 2015 Apr. Regulation No.: EU2015/757.

[ 5 ] European Parliament. Parliament says shipping industry must contribute to climate neutrality [Internet]. London: European Parliament; 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 18]. Available from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/ press-room/20200910IPR86825/parliament-says-shipping-industry-mustcontribute-to-climate-neutrality. link1

[ 6 ] Lagouvardou S, Psaraftis HN, Zis T. A literature survey on market-based measures for the decarbonization of shipping. Sustainability 2020;12(10):3953. link1

[ 7 ] Bouman EA, Lindstad E, Rialland AI, Strømman AH. State-of-the-art technologies, measures, and potential for reducing GHG emissions from shipping—a review. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 2017;52:408–21. link1

[ 8 ] Metzger D, Schinas O. Fuzzy real options and shared savings: investment appraisal for green shipping technologies. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 2019;77:1–10. link1

[ 9 ] Zis T, Psaraftis HN, Panagakos G, Kronbak J. Policy measures to avert possible modal shifts caused by sulphur regulation in the European Ro–Ro sector. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 2019;70:1–17. link1

[10] Zis T, Psaraftis HN. Operational measures to mitigate and reverse the potential modal shifts due to environmental legislation. Marit Policy Manage 2019;46 (1):117–32. link1

[11] Gu Y, Wallace SW, Wang X. Can an Emission Trading Scheme really reduce CO2 emissions in the short term? Evidence from a maritime fleet composition and deployment model. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 2019;74:318–38. link1

[12] Zhen L,Wu Y, Wang S, Laporte G. Green technology adoption for fleet deployment in a shipping network. Transp Res Pt B Methodol 2020;139:388–410. link1

[13] Marine Insight. New Suez Canal transit tolls during 2020 [Internet]. Bangalore: Marine Insight; 2020 [cited 2021 Jan 2]. Available from: https:// www.marineinsight.com/shipping-news/new-suez-canal-transit-tolls-during2020/. link1

[14] Theloadstar. Lines using cheaper Cape of Good Hope route will cost Suez Canal $10m; 2020 [cited 2021 Jan 2]. Available from: https://theloadstar. com/lines-using-cheaper-cape-of-good-hope-route-will-cost-suez-canal10m/. link1

[15] Meng Q, Wang S, Andersson H, Thun K. Containership routing and scheduling in liner shipping: overview and future research directions. Transport Sci 2014;48(2):265–80. link1

Related Research