2021, Volume 23, Issue 3
Strategic Study of CAE >> 2021, Volume 23, Issue 3 doi: 10.15302/J-SSCAE-2021.03.016
Development Strategies for Nuclear Fuel Cycle Standardization in China
1. China Institute of Nuclear Industry Strategy, Beijing 100048, China;
2. State Administration of Science, Technology and Industry for National Defence, PRC, Beijing 100048, China;
3. Graduate School of China Academy of Engineering Physics, Beijing 100088, China;
4. China Nuclear Energy Industry Corporation, Beijing 100032, China
Next Previous
Abstract
Nuclear fuel cycle standardization is important for the safe and innovative development of the nuclear fuel cycle industry, especially when China has currently entered a high-quality development stage. Therefore, conducting strategic research on nuclear fuel cycle standardization becomes significant for boosting China’s nuclear industry. In this article, we analyze the development status of nuclear fuel cycle standardization in China and abroad, investigate the key problems of nuclear fuel cycle standardization in China from the perspectives of working mechanism, development balance, leading role, and support ability, and propose the major tasks and relevant countermeasures. Specifically, the major tasks involve seven aspects: post-stage standards of the nuclear fuel cycle, standards for key technologies, advanced standards, frontier basic standards, safety and environmental protection standards, international standardization, and basic capacities for standardization. Furthermore, the countermeasures comprise including nuclear fuel cycle standardization into the 14th Five-Year Plan of the nuclear industry, improving the standardization mechanism, increasing investment, and strengthening the construction of standardization talent teams.
Keywords
nuclear fuel cycle ; high-quality development ; technical standards ; basic ability ; international standardization
References
[ 1 ] Li G X, Zhou B X, Xiao M, et al. Overall development strategy of China’s new-generation nuclear fuel [J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 2019, 21(1): 6-11. Chinese. link1
[ 2 ] Dong F F, Li G Q, Wu Q. Analysis on the current situation of safety and environmental protection standardization of uranium mining and metallurgy in China [J]. Nuclear Standard Measurement and Quality, 2016 (2): 12-16. Chinese. link1
[ 3 ] Taghvaeenezhad M, Shayestehfar M, Moarefvand P, et al. Quantifying the criteria for classification of mineral resources and reserves through the estimation of block model uncertainty using geostatistical methods: A case study of Khoshoumi Uranium deposit in Yazd, Iran [J]. Geosystem Engineering, 2020, 23(4): 216-225. link1
[ 4 ] Herbst R S, Baron P, Nilsson M. Standard and advanced separation: PUREX processes for nuclear fuel reprocessing [J]. Advanced Separation Techniques for Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing and Radioactive Waste Treatment, 2011: 141-175. link1
[ 5 ] Jiang X D, Zhao B, Shen Z Q, et al. Exploration on the construction of technical standard system for decommissioning of nuclear facilities [J]. Industrial & Science Tribune, 2018, 17(9): 77-79. link1
[ 6 ] Gopalakrishnan R K. Summary of IAEA safety standards series No. SSG-42: Specific safety guide on “Safety of nuclear fuel reprocessing facilities” (May 2017) [J]. Radiation Protection and Environment, 2017, 40(2): 103-105. link1
[ 7 ] Kang Y X. Discussion on the development strategy of nuclear industry technical standards [J]. Nuclear Standard Measurement and Quality, 2009 (3): 5-13. Chinese. link1
[ 8 ] Liu S Y, Sun Y C, Wei R, et al. Reflections and prospects on promoting China’s participation in the international nuclear energy standardization work [J]. China Standardization, 2020 (6): 38-46. Chinese. link1
京公网安备 11010502051620号
