2022, Volume 12, Issue 5
Engineering >> 2022, Volume 12, Issue 5 doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2021.06.028
Origami-Based Design for 4D Printing of 3D Support-Free Hollow Structures
a Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne UMR 6303, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique & Université de Technologie de Belfort-Montbéliard, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Belfort 90400, France
b George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, United States
c Laboratoire Réactions et Génie des Procédés UMR 7274, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique–Université de Lorraine, Nancy 54001, France
Next Previous
Abstract
The integration of additive manufacturing (AM) in design and engineering has prompted a wide spectrum of research efforts, involving topologically optimized solid/lattice structures, multimaterial structures, bioinspired organic structures, and multiscale structures, to name a few. However, except for obvious cases, very little attention has been given to the design and printing of more complex three-dimensional (3D) hollow structures or folded/creased structures. One of the main reasons is that such complex open or closed 3D cavities and regular/freeform folds generally lead to printing difficulties from support-structure-related issues. To address this barrier, this paper aims to investigate four-dimensional (4D) printing as well as origami-based design as an original research direction to design and build 3D support-free hollow structures. This work consists of describing the rough 3D hollow structures in terms of two-dimensional (2D) printed origami precursor layouts without any support structure. Such origami-based definitions are then embodied with folding functions that can be actuated and fulfilled by 3D printed smart materials. The desired 3D shape is then built once an external stimulus is applied to the active materials, therefore ensuring the transformation of the 2D origami layout to 3D structures. To demonstrate the relevance of the proposal, some illustrative cases are introduced.
Keywords
Origami-based design ; 4D printing ; Smart material ; Hollow 3D structures ; Additive manufacturing
Figures
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
References
[ 1 ] Ngo TD, Kashani A, Imbalzano G, Nguyen KTQ, Hui D. Additive manufacturing (3D printing): a review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Compos Part B Eng 2018;143:172–96. link1
[ 2 ] Plocher J, Panesar A. Review on design and structural optimisation in additive manufacturing: towards next-generation lightweight structures. Mater Des 2019;183:108164. link1
[ 3 ] Lebaal N, Zhang Y, Demoly F, Roth S, Gomes S, Bernard A. Optimised lattice structure configuration for additive manufacturing. CIRP Ann 2019;68 (1):117–20. link1
[ 4 ] Horn TJ, Harrysson OLA. Overview of current additive manufacturing technologies and selected applications. Sci Prog 2012;95(3):255–82. link1
[ 5 ] Peraza-Hernandez EA, Hartl DJ, Malak Jr RJ, Lagoudas DC. Origami-inspired active structures: a synthesis and review. Smart Mater Struct 2014;23 (9):094001. link1
[ 6 ] Hof LA, Wüthrich R. Industry 4.0—towards fabrication of mass-personalized parts on glass by spark assisted chemical engraving (SACE). Manuf Lett 2018;15:76–80. link1
[ 7 ] Wang P, Chu W, Li W, Tan Y, Liu F, Wang M, et al. Three-dimensional laser printing of macro-scale glass objects at a micro-scale resolution. Micromachines 2019;10(9):565. link1
[ 8 ] Introduction to the QuickCast Patterns [Internet]. Rock Hill: 3D Systems, Inc.; [cited 2021 Dec 20]. Available from: http://infocenter.3dsystems.com/ bestpractices/sla-best-practices/quickcast-pattern-design-guide/introductionquickcast-patterns. link1
[ 9 ] Vanek J, Galicia JAG, Benes B. Clever support: efficient support structure generation for digital fabrication. Comput Graph Forum 2014;33(5):117–25. link1
[10] Germain L, Fuentes CA, van Vuure AW, des Rieux A, Dupont-Gillain C. 3Dprinted biodegradable gyroid scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Mater Des 2018;151:113–22. link1
[11] An J, Teoh JEM, Suntornnond R, Chua CK. Design and 3D printing of scaffolds and tissues. Engineering 2015;1(2):261–8. link1
[12] Zhang N, Zhang LC, Chen Y, Shi YS. Local barycenter based efficient treesupport generation for 3D printing. Comput Aided Des 2019;115:277–92. link1
[13] Lu L, Sharf A, Zhao H, Wei Y, Fan Q, Chen X, et al. Build-to-last: strength to weight 3D printed objects. ACM Trans Graph 2014;33(4):97. link1
[14] Wang W, Wang TY, Yang Z, Liu L, Tong X, Tong W, et al. Cost-effective printing of 3D objects with skin-frame structures. ACM Trans Graph 2013;32(6):177. link1
[15] Zhang X, Xia Y, Wang J, Yang Z, Tu C, Wang W. Medial axis tree—an internal supporting structure for 3D printing. Comput Aided Geom Des 2015;35- 36:149–62. link1
[16] Thalamy P, Piranda B, Bourgeois J. Distributed self-reconfiguration using a deterministic autonomous scaffolding structure. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems; 2019 May 13–17; Montreal, QC, Canada; 2019. p.140–8.
[17] Carbon lattice innovation—the adidas story [Internet]. Redwood City: Carbon, Inc.; [cited 2021 Dec 20]. Available from: https://www.carbon3d.com/ resources/whitepaper/the-adidas-story/. link1
[18] Li VCF, Kuang X, Hamel CM, Roach D, Deng Y, Qi HJ. Cellulose nanocrystals support material for 3D printing complexly shaped structures via multimaterials–multi-methods printing. Addit Manuf 2019;28:14–22. link1
[19] Senior JJ, Cooke ME, Grover LM, Smith AM. Fabrication of complex hydrogel structures using suspended layer additive manufacturing (SLAM). Adv Funct Mater 2019;29(49):1904845. link1
[20] Mao D, Li Q, Li D, Chen Y, Chen X, Xu X. Fabrication of 3D porous poly (lactic acid)-based composite scaffolds with tunable biodegradation for bone tissue engineering. Mater Des 2018;142:1–10. link1
[21] Andre JC, Gallais L, inventors; Centrale Marseille, Aix-Marseille University, French National Centre for Scientific Research, assignees. Method for producing a three-dimensional object by a multiphoton photopolymerisation process, and associated device. WO/2019/186070. 2021 Mar 25. French.
[22] Loterie D, Delrot P, Moser C. High-resolution tomographic volumetric additive manufacturing. Nat Commun 2020;11(1):852. link1
[23] Kelly BE, Bhattacharya I, Heidari H, Shusteff M, Spadaccini CM, Taylor HK. Volumetric additive manufacturing via tomographic reconstruction. Science 2019;363(6431):1075–9. link1
[24] de Beer MP, van der Laan HL, Cole MA, Whelan RJ, Burns MA, Scott TF. Rapid, continuous additive manufacturing by volumetric polymerization inhibition patterning. Sci Adv 2019;5(1):eaau8723. link1
[25] Moore DG, Barbera L, Masania K, Studart AR. Three-dimensional printing of multicomponent glasses using phase-separating resins. Nat Mater 2020;19 (2):212–7. link1
[26] Mitchell A, Lafont U, Hołyn´ ska M, Semprimoschnig C. Additive manufacturing—a review of 4D printing and future applications. Addit Manuf 2018;24:606–26. link1
[27] Wei X, Qiu S, Zhu L, Feng R, Tian Y, Xi J, et al. Toward support-free 3D printing: a skeletal approach for partitioning models. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 2018;24(10):2799–812. link1
[28] Xie Y, Chen X. Support-free interior carving for 3D printing. Vis Inform 2017;1 (1):9–15. link1
[29] Dai C, Wang CCL, Wu C, Lefebvre S, Fang G, Liu YJ. Support-free volume printing by multi-axis motion. ACM Trans Graph 2018;37(4):134. link1
[30] André JC. From additive manufacturing to 3D/4D printing: breakthrough innovations: programmable material, 4D printing and bioprinting. London: Wiley-ISTE; 2018. link1
[31] Momeni F, Hassani.N SMM, Liu X, Ni J. A review of 4D printing. Mater Des 2017;122:42–79. link1
[32] Yuan C, Wang F, Qi B, Ding Z, Rosen DW, Ge Q. 3D printing of multi-material composites with tunable shape memory behavior. Mater Des 2020;193:108785. link1
[33] Tibbits S, McKnelly C, Olguin C, Dikovsky D, Hirsch S. 4D printing and universal transformation. In: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture; 2014 Oct 23–25; Los Angeles, CA, USA; 2014. p. 539–48.
[34] Demaine ED, O’Rourke J. Geometric folding algorithms: linkages, origami, polyhedra. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. link1
[35] Wagner MA, Huang JL, Okle P, Paik J, Spolenak R. Hinges for origami-inspired structures by multimaterial additive manufacturing. Mater Des 2020;191:108643. link1
[36] Demoly F, Dunn ML, Wood KL, Qi HJ, André JC. The status, barriers, challenges, and future in design for 4D printing. Mater Des 2021;212:110193. link1
[37] Sossou G, Demoly F, Belkebir H, Qi HJ, Gomes S, Montavon G. Design for 4D printing: a voxel-based modeling and simulation of smart materials. Mater Des 2019;175:107798. link1
[38] Sossou G, Demoly F, Belkebir H, Qi HJ, Gomes S, Montavon G. Design for 4D printing: modeling and computation of smart materials distributions. Mater Des 2019;181:108074. link1
[39] Ge Q, Dunn CK, Qi HJ, Dunn ML. Active origami by 4D printing. Smart Mater Struct 2014;23(9):094007. link1
[40] Ge Q, Qi HJ, Dunn ML. Active materials by four-dimension printing. Appl Phys Lett 2013;103(13):131901. link1
[41] Yuan C, Wang T, Dunn ML, Qi HJ. 3D printed active origami with complicated folding patterns. Int J Precis Eng Manuf Green Technol 2017;4 (3):281–9. link1
[42] Kwok TH, Wang CCL, Deng D, Zhang Y, Chen Y. Four-dimensional printing for freeform surfaces: design optimization of origami and kirigami structures. J Mech Des 2015;137(11):111413. link1
[43] Van Manen T, Janbaz S, Zadpoor AA. Programming 2D/3D shape-shifting with hobbyist 3D printers. Mater Horiz 2017;4(6):1064–9. link1
[44] Jian B, Demoly F, Zhang Y, Gomes S. An origami-based design approach to selfreconfigurable structures using 4D printing technology. Proced CIRP 2019;84:159–64. link1
[45] Lee AY, An J, Chua CK, Zhang Y. Preliminary investigation of the reversible 4D printing of a dual-layer component. Engineering 2019;5(6):1159–70. link1
[46] Turner N, Goodwine B, Sen M. A review of origami applications in mechanical engineering. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 2016;230(14):2345–62. link1
[47] Lang RJ, Miura K. The tree method of origami design. In: Miura K, editor. Origami science & art: Proceedings of the Second International Meeting of Origami Science and Scientific Origami. Otsu: Seian University of Art and Design; 1994. p. 73–82. link1
[48] Firby PA, Gardiner CF. Surface topology. 3rd ed. Sawston: Woodhead Publishing Limited; 2001. link1
[49] Liu S, Li Q, Liu J, Chen W, Zhang Y. A realization method for transforming a topology optimization design into additive manufacturing structures. Engineering 2018;4(2):277–85. link1
[50] West DB. Introduction to graph theory. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice hall; 2001. link1
[51] Hedetniemi SM, Cockayne EJ, Hedetniemi ST. Linear algorithms for finding the Jordan center and path center of a tree. Transport Sci 1981;15 (2):98–114. link1
[52] Yang XS. Multi-objective optimization. In: Nature-inspired optimization algorithms. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2014. p. 197–211. link1
[53] Jian B, Demoly F, Zhang Y, Gomes S. Towards a design framework for multifunctional shape memory polymer based product in the era of 4D printing. Smart materials, adaptive structures and intelligent systems. New York City: American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2018. link1
[54] Wang Q, Tian X, Huang L, Li D, Malakhov AV, Polilov AN. Programmable morphing composites with embedded continuous fibers by 4D printing. Mater Des 2018;155:404–13. link1
[55] Lee AY, An J, Chua CK. Two-way 4D printing: a review on the reversibility of 3D-printed shape memory materials. Engineering 2017;3 (5):663–74. link1
[56] Dimassi S, Demoly F, Cruz C, Qi HJ, Kim KY, André JC, et al. An ontology-based framework to formalize and represent 4D printing knowledge in design. Comput Ind 2021;126:103374. link1
京公网安备 11010502051620号
