[ 1 ] Rajan G, Prusty BG. Structural health monitoring of composite structures using fiber optic methods. New York City: CRC Press; 2017. link1

[ 2 ] Staszewski WJ, Boller C, Tomlinson GR. Health monitoring of aerospace structures: smart sensor technologies and signal processing. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; 2003. link1

[ 3 ] Yuan FG. Structural health monitoring (SHM) in aerospace structures. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; 2016. link1

[ 4 ] Wada D, Igawa H, Tamayama M, Kasai T, Arizono H, Murayama H. Flight demonstration of aircraft wing monitoring using optical fiber distributed sensing system. Smart Mater Struct 2019;28(5):055007. link1

[ 5 ] Jutte CV, Ko WL, Stephens CA, Bakalyar JA, Richards WL. Deformed shape calculation of a full-scale wing using fiber optic strain data from a ground loads test. Report. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration; 2011 Dec 1.

[ 6 ] Ko WL, Richards WL, Tran VT. Displacement theories for in-flight deformed shape predictions of aerospace structures. Report. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration; 2007 Oct 1.

[ 7 ] Nishio M, Takeda N. Shape reconstruction of composite structures with monitoring of modeling changes using Brillouin-scattering based distributed optical fiber strain sensor network. In: Proceedings of Conference on Smart Sensor Phenomena, Technology, Networks, and Systems; 2009 Apr 7; San Diego, CA, USA; 2009.

[ 8 ] Zhao S, Cui J, Chen M. Review on optical fiber shape sensing technology. Opt Precis Eng 2020;28(1):10–29. Chinese. link1

[ 9 ] Gherlone M, Cerracchio P, Mattone M. Shape sensing methods: review and experimental comparison on a wing-shaped plate. Prog Aerosp Sci 2018;99:14–26. link1

[10] Cerracchio P, Gherlone M, Di Sciuva M, Tessler A. Shape and stress sensing of multilayered composite and sandwich structures using an inverse finite element method. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computational Methods for Coupled Problems in Science and Engineering; 2013 Jun 17–19; Ibiza, Spain; 2013. link1

[11] Foss GC, Haugse ED. Using modal test results to develop strain to displacement transformations. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Modal Analysis; 1995 Feb 13–16; Nashville, TN, USA; 1995. link1

[12] Rao YJ. Recent progress in ultra-long distributed optical fiber sensing. Acta Phys Sin 2017;66(7):074207. Chinese. link1

[13] Kuang Y, Wu H, Zhang J, Zhou H, Zheng H, Huang L, et al. Advances of key technologies on distributed fiber system for multi-parameter sensing. Opto Electron Eng 2018;45(9):170678. Chinese. link1

[14] Liu TG, Yu Z, Jiang JF, Liu K, Zhang XZ, Ding ZY, et al. Advances of some critical technologies in discrete and distributed optical fiber sensing research. Acta Phys Sin 2017;66(7):070705. Erratum in: Acta Phys Sin 2017;66(9):099901. Chinese.

[15] Fedorov AY, Kosheleva NA, Matveenko VP, Serovaev GS. Strain measurement and stress analysis in the vicinity of a fiber Bragg grating sensor embedded in a composite material. Compos Struct 2020;239:111844. link1

[16] Tian K, Zhang M, Yu J, Jiang Y, Zhao H, Wang X, et al. High sensitivity, low temperature-crosstalk strain sensor based on a microsphere embedded Fabry– Perot interferometer. Sens Actuators A 2020;310:112048. link1

[17] Kumar A, Subhashree Ojha NN, Kumar N. Highly sensitive single-fiber MZI configuration for weight sensing. Opt Laser Technol 2020;130:106334. link1

[18] Wang G, Song Q, Peng H, Xiao Q, Zhao D, Jia B. Dual-wavelength Michelson interferometer employing time delay estimation for distributed disturbance location. Opt Fiber Technol 2020;56:102181. link1

[19] Di Sante R. Fibre optic sensors for structural health monitoring of aircraft composite structures: recent advances and applications. Sensors 2015;15(8): 18666–713. link1

[20] Kwon H, Park Y, Kim JH, Kim CG. Embedded fiber Bragg grating sensor-based wing load monitoring system for composite aircraft. Struct Health Monit 2019;18(4):1337–51. Erratum in: Struct Health Monit 2019;20(3):1051.

[21] Koch J, Angelmahr M, Schade W. Arrayed waveguide grating interrogator for fiber Bragg grating sensors: measurement and simulation. Appl Opt 2012;51(31): 7718–23. link1

[22] Zhang H. Shape perception and reconstruction for flexible plate structure based on discrete orthogonal FBG network [dissertation]. Shanghai: Shanghai University; 2015. Chinese. link1

[23] Tessler A, Spangler JL, Matteone MC, Gherlone M, Di Sciuva M. Real-time characterization of aerospace structures using onboard strain measurement technologies and inverse finite element method. Report. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration; 2011.

[24] Gherlone M, Cerracchio P, Mattone M, Di Sciuva M, Tessler A. Shape sensing of 3D frame structures using an inverse finite element method. Int J Solids Struct 2012;49(22):3100–12. link1

[25] Kefal A, Tessler A, Oterkus E. An efficient inverse finite element method for shape and stress sensing of laminated composite and sandwich plates and shells. Report. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration; 2018 Jul 1.

[26] Tessler A, Roy R, Esposito M, Surace C, Gherlone M. Shape sensing of plate and shell structures undergoing large displacements using the inverse finite element method. Shock Vib 2018;2018:8076085. link1

[27] Vazquez SL, Tessler A, Quach CC, Cooper EG, Parks J, Spangler JL. Structural health monitoring using high-density fiber optic strain sensor and inverse finite element methods. Report. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration; 2005.

[28] Quach CC, Vazquez SL, Tessler A, Moore JP, Cooper EG, Spangler JL. Structural anomaly detection using fiber optic sensors and inverse finite element method. In: Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit; 2005 Aug 15–18; San Francisco, CA, USA; 2012. link1

[29] Ko WL, Fleischer VT. Extension of Ko straight-beam displacement theory to deformed shape predictions of slender curved structures. Report. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration; 2011 Apr 1.

[30] Chan P. Fiber Optics sensing system (FOSS) at NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center (AFRC): summary and recent deployments. Report. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration; 2018.

[31] Richards L, Parker AR, Piazza A, Chan P, Hamory P, Pena F. NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center (AFRC) fiber optic sensing system (FOSS) technology. Report. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration; 2014.

[32] Richards WL, Parker AR Jr, Ko WL, Piazza A, Chan P. Application of fiber optic instrumentation. Report. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration; 2012 Jul 1.

[33] Kressel I, Dorfman B, Botsev Y, Handelman A, Balter J, Pillai ACR, et al. Flight validation of an embedded structural health monitoring system for an unmanned aerial vehicle. Smart Mater Struct 2015;24(7):075022. link1

[34] Wada D, Igawa H, Tamayama M, Kasai T, Arizono H, Murayama H, et al. Flight demonstration of aircraft fuselage and bulkhead monitoring using optical fiber distributed sensing system. Smart Mater Struct 2018;27(2):025014. link1

[35] Shoenfelt NM. Fiber optic sensors for the military. Report. Picatinny Arsenal: US Army Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center; 1991 Feb. Report No.: ARFSD-TR-90024.

[36] Friebele EJ, Askins CG, Bosse AB, Kersey AD, Patrick HJ, Pogue WR, et al. Optical fiber sensors for spacecraft applications. Smart Mater Struct 1999;8(6): 813–38. link1

[37] Friebele EJ, Askins CG, Miller GA, Peele JR, Wasserman LR. Optical fiber sensors for spacecraft: applications and challenges. In: Proceedings of the Photonics for Space Environments IX; 2004 Aug 2–6; Denver, CO, USA; 2004.

[38] Mckenzie I, Karafolas N. Fiber optic sensing in space structures: the experience of the European Space Agency. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Optical Fiber Sensors; 2005 May 23–27; Bruges, Belgium; 2005. link1

[39] Orr JS, Trevino LC, Dalton CL. Advanced optical sensor technology: launch vehicle and spacecraft applications. In: Proceedings of AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference; 2014 Jun 16–20; Atlanta, GA, USA; 2014. link1

[40] Reutlinger A, Glier M, Zuknik KH, Hoffmann L, Müller M, Rapp S, et al. Fiber optic sensing for telecommunication satellites. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Space Optics; 2008 Oct 14–17; Toulouse, France; 2017. link1

[41] Heredero RL, Frövel M, Laguna H, Belenguer T. In-orbit demonstration of fiber optic sensors based on Bragg gratings. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Space Optics; 2018 Oct 9–12; Chania, Greece; 2019. link1

[42] Putzer P, Koch AW, Plattner M, Hurni A, Manhart M. Design of a fiber-optic interrogator module for telecommunication satellites. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Space Optics; 2012 Oct 9–12; Ajaccio, France; 2017. link1

[43] Hurni A, Lemke NMK, Roner M, Obermaier J, Putzer P, Kuhenuri Cham N. Fiber optical sensing on-board communication satellites. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Space Optics. 2014 Oct 7–10; Tenerife, Spain; 2017. link1

[44] Shao F, Yang N, Sun W, Shen J, Zhang J. Research on spacecraft structural health monitoring based on optical fiber sensing technology. Spacecr Eng 2018;27(2): 95–103. Chinese. link1

[45] Girard S, Morana A, Ladaci A, Robin T, Mescia L, Bonnefois JJ, et al. Recent advances in radiation-hardened fiber-based technologies for space applications. J Opt 2018;20(9):093001. link1

[46] Riziotis C, Eineder L, Bancallari L, Tussiwand G. Fiber optic architectures for strain monitoring of solid rocket motors’ propellant. Sens Lett 2013;11(8): 1403–7. link1

[47] Siivola J, Minakuchi S, Takeda N. Dimpling monitoring and assessment of satellite honeycomb sandwich structures by distributed fiber optic sensors. Procedia Eng 2017;188:186–93. link1

[48] Shen J. Research on on-orbit condition monitoring technology of spacecraft structure based on optical fiber sensing [dissertation]. Xi’an: Xidian University; 2019. Chinese. link1

[49] Iele A, Leone M, Consales M, Persiano GV, Brindisi A, Ameduri S, et al. Load monitoring of aircraft landing gears using fiber optic sensors. Sens Actuators A 2018;281:31–41. link1

[50] Gutiérrez N, Fernández R, Galvín P, Lasagni F. Fiber Bragg grating application to study an unmanned aerial system composite wing. J Intell Mater Syst Strut 2019;30(8):1252–62. link1

[51] Iadicicco A, Natale D, Di Palma P, Spinaci F, Apicella A, Campopiano S. Strain monitoring of a composite drag strut in aircraft landing gear by fiber Bragg grating sensors. Sensors 2019;19(10):2239. link1

[52] Kefal A, Yildiz M. Modeling of sensor placement strategy for shape sensing and structural health monitoring of a wing-shaped sandwich panel using inverse finite element method. Sensors 2017;17(12):2775. link1

[53] Chen S. Research on deformation measurement and reconstruction method for composite structures based on strains [dissertation]. Xi’an: Xidian University; 2018. Chinese. link1

[54] Liu P. Research on spatial truss structure morphology monitoring technology based on distributed optical fiber sensing technology [dissertation]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics; 2019. Chinese. link1

[55] Ko WL, Richards WL, Fleischer VT. Applications of Ko displacement theory to the deformed shape predictions of the doubly-tapered Ikhana wing. Report. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration; 2009 Oct 1.

[56] Johnson WL, Rhys NO, Bradley DE, Wollen M, Kutter B, Gravlee M, et al. Cryogenic orbital testbed (CRYOTE) ground test article. Report. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration; 2015 Oct.

[57] Wang H, Xiang P, Jiang L. Strain transfer theory of industrialized optical fiberbased sensors in civil engineering: a review on measurement accuracy, design and calibration. Sens Actuators A 2019;285:414–26. link1

[58] Goossens S, De Pauw B, Geernaert T, Salmanpour MS, Khodaei ZS, Karachalios E, et al. Aerospace-grade surface mounted optical fiber strain sensor for structural health monitoring on composite structures evaluated against inflight conditions. Smart Mater Struct 2019;28(6):065008. link1

[59] Hegedus G, Sarkadi T, Czigany T. Self-sensing composite: reinforcing fiberglass bundle for damage detection. Compos Part A 2020;131:105804. link1

[60] Hoffman J, Waters DH, Khadka S, Kumosa MS. Shape sensing of polymer core composite electrical transmission lines using FBG sensors. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 2020;69(1):249–57. link1

[61] Nicolas MJ, Sullivan RW, Richards WL. Large scale applications using FBG sensors: determination of in-flight loads and shape of a composite aircraft wing. Aerospace 2016;3(3):18. link1

[62] Zhu L, Sun G, Li H, Dong M. Intelligent and flexible morphing wing technology: a review. J Mech Eng 2018;54(14):28–42. Chinese. link1

[63] Jenett B, Calisch S, Cellucci D, Cramer N, Gershenfeld N, Swei S, et al. Digital morphing wing: active wing shaping concept using composite lattice-based cellular structures. Soft Robot 2017;4(1):33–48. link1

[64] Di Luca M, Mintchev S, Heitz G, Noca F, Floreano D. Bioinspired morphing wings for extended flight envelope and roll control of small drones. Interface Focus 2017;7(1):20160092. link1

[65] Koreanschi A, Sugar Gabor O, Acotto J, Brianchon G, Portier G, Botez RM, et al. Optimization and design of an aircraft’s morphing wing-tip demonstrator for drag reduction at low speed, Part I—aerodynamic optimization using genetic, bee colony and gradient descent algorithms. Chin J Aeronaut 2017;30(1): 149–63. link1

[66] Wang X, Liu Z, Cong Y, Li J, Chen H. Miniature fixed-wing UAV swarms: review and outlook. Acta Aeronaut et Astronaut Sin 2020;41(4):023732. Chinese. link1

[67] Yang C, Liu J, Xiong Z, Lai J, Xiong J. Brain-inspired navigation technology integrating perception and action decision: a review and outlook. Acta Aeronaut et Astronaut Sin 2020;41(1):023280. Chinese. link1

[68] Niu W. Intelligent air passenger transportation system utilizing integrated space–ground information network. Acta Aeronaut et Astronaut Sin 2019;40(1): 522415. Chinese. link1

[69] Li L, Xie L, Zhang Y, Wu Q. Application of data mining in intelligence test of launch vehicles. Acta Aeronaut et Astronaut Sin 2018;39(Suppl 1):722203. Chinese. link1

[70] Chen S, Chu L, Yang X, Cai D. Application of state prediction neural network control algorithm in small reusable rocket. Acta Aeronaut et Astronaut Sin 2019;40(3):322286. Chinese. link1

[71] Meng S, Ye Y, Yang Q, Huang Z, Xie W. Digital twin and its aerospace applications. Acta Aeronaut et Astronaut Sin 2020;41(9):023615. Chinese. link1

[72] Kong X, Cai J, Zhang L, Tang J, Hou C. Research status and development trend of big data in aviation system. Acta Aeronaut et Astronaut Sin 2018;39(12): 022311. Chinese. link1

[73] Pei Y, Song B, Shi S. Analysis method of aircraft combat survivability: progress and challenge. Acta Aeronaut et Astronaut Sin 2016;37(1):216–34. Chinese. link1

[74] Zhang Z, Zhu X, Zhu S, Zhang M, Du W. Unsupervised evaluation of airspace complexity based on kernel principal component analysis. Acta Aeronaut et Astronaut Sin 2019;40(8):322969. Chinese. link1