Journal Home Online First Current Issue Archive For Authors Journal Information 中文版

Strategic Study of CAE >> 2007, Volume 9, Issue 8

College of Environmental Science and Engineer, Nankai University, Tianjin300071, China

1. College of Environmental Science and Engineer, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China;

2. China Academy of Safety Sciences and Technology, Beijing 100029, China

Funding project:科研院所社会公益研究资助项目(2004DID2J06) Received: 2006-06-15

Next Previous

Abstract

Selecting route for hazardous materials (Hazmat) transportation by road is a bilateral decision between local government and the carriers,  involving safety,  environmental and economic factors.  Among them,  the quantitative risk assessment is an important method.  However,  there has been no agreement among researchers on the proper model of the associated transport risk and dfferent models to quantify risk in different ways.  In this paper,  the most common Hazmat transport risk models in the literature are reviewed,  which are divided into five classes including traditional risk model and models derived from it,  perceived risk,  conditional risk,  catastrophe avoidance models and modified traditional risk models.  Moreover,  it is discussed in detail on multiple trips multi-accident.  Finall y,  an example used by these models is evaluated,  and the challenging development of risk model is proposed.

Figures

图 1

图 2

图 3

图 4

References

[ 1 ] List G F, Mirchandani P B, Turnquist, et al. Modeling and analysis for hazardous materials transportation: risk analysis.routing/scheduling and facility location [J]. Transportation Science, 1991, 25 (2):100 -114 link1

[ 2 ] Erkut E. V Verter. Hazardous Materials Logistics. In Drezner Z(Ed). Facility Location: A survey of applications and methods [M].Springer Series in Operations Research,New-York:Springer-Verlag,1995

[ 3 ] Erkut E,Verter V.Modeling of transport risk for hazardous materials[J].Operations Research,1998,46(5):625-642 link1

[ 4 ] 吴宗之,多英全,刘茂,等,危险品道路运输过程风险分析与评价方法研究[J].应用基础与工程科学学报(增刊),2004,12(S1):36-44

[ 5 ] Alp E.Risk-based transportation planning practice:overall methodiology and a case example[J].INFOR,1995,33(1):4-19 link1

[ 6 ] ReVelle C,Cohon J.Shobrys D.Simultaneous siting and routing in the disposal of hazardous wastes[J].Transp Sci,1991,25(2):138-145 link1

[ 7 ] Saccomanno F F,Chan A.Economic evaluation of routing strategies for hazardous road shipments [J]. Transp Res Recond,1985 (1020):12-18 link1

[ 8 ] Abkowitz M, Lepofsky M, Cheng P. Selecting criteria for designating hazardous materials highway routes [J]. Transp Res Rec, 1992 (1333): 30 -35 link1

[ 9 ] Sivakumar R A, Batta R, Karwan M H. A network-based model for transporting extremely hazardous materials [J]. Oper Res Lett, 1993,13 (2):85-93 link1

[10] Erkut E, Ingolfsson A. Catastrophe avoidaunce models for hazardous materials route planning [J]. Transportation Science, 2000, 34(2): 165-179 link1

[11] Erkut E, Ingolfsson A. Transport risk models for hazardous materials: revisited[J]. Operations Research Letters, 2005,33(1):81-89 link1

Related Research